Back

Home

Animals as Philosophical and Ethical Subjects


Animals as Reflexive Thinkers


Domestication and Predation


Animals as Entertainment and Spectacle

Animals as Companions


Animals as Symbols


Animals in Science, Education and Therapy


Animals in History


Animals as Food


Animals in Literature and Ecocriticism


Animals in Feminism and Ecofeminism


Animals in Religion, Myth, and Folktales


Conservation and Animal/Human Conflict


Miscellaneous

Contact
LKalof@msu.edu

Linda Kalof,
Seven Bryant,
Amy Fitzgerald
Department of Sociology, Michigan State University,
East Lansing, MI 48824

Eddy, Timothy J., Gordon G. Gallup, Jr., and Daniel J. Povinelli. 1993. Attribution of cognitive states to animals: Anthropomorphism in comparative perspective. Journal of Social Issues 49 (1): 87-101.

Anthropomorphism is the attribution of mental processes and other traits from human experience to animals. The authors argue that it is an extension of the human “introspective modeling capacity” through which we predict and explain others' behavior based on our own experience. This phenomenon can be explained by attribution theory.

Hypothesis

Consistent with the bias toward the similar in attributions to other humans, it was hypothesized that subjects would be more likely to attribute cognitive states to animals similar to humans.

Independent Variables/Operational Definitions

(1) The animal's similarity to humans, as judged by Rs--study included a list of 30 animals, representing all levels of the phylogenetic scale; similarity index composed of responses to “degree to which you feel the animal is similar to you” and “degree to which you feel the animal experiences the world in a way that is similar to the way [you do]”

Dependent Variables/Operational Definitions

(1) Attribution of cognitive functions to the animals--cognitive ability index composed of responses to three items: animal's ability to trick another animal to get food for itself; whether animal could recognize itself in a mirror; whether animal could tell the difference between being tripped over and being kicked

Findings

Animals' similarity rating was correlated with their place on the phylogenetic scale and with the amount of cognitive function respondents attributed to them. Anthropomorphic attribution is thus based on a pattern, rather than carried out indiscriminately. People most often attribute cognitive functions to animals physically similar to humans or animals with which they have a particular bond (e.g. house pets). Further research must determine whether the same pattern occurs in attribution of emotional states to animals, whether our attributions are scientifically correct, and whether animals engage in zoomorphism.

Sample/population sampled

The sample consisted of 104 undergraduate volunteers enrolled in introductory psychology at SUNY, Albany. The study was conducted early in the semester to ensure the subjects had had limited exposure to psychology.

Back